How is death in the ring interpreted from the point of view of criminal law?

How is death in the ring interpreted from the point of view of criminal law?

Interface of Law & Medicine - Interpretation of Postmortem findings by Dr.Rajaram N | LETILS by SPA

Previous questionMuscles ache after training, is this normal?
Next questionHow many times a day should the abdominal vacuum be done to reduce the waist?

answers (5)

Answer 1
June, 2021

Of course, will be judged . And, as a Russian citizen , according to the laws of the Russian Federation - in accordance with Part 1 of Article 12 of the Criminal Code.

However, I would argue that death in the ring, even at the hands of another person, would be considered exactly murder . In our criminal law, murder means exclusively intentional deprivation of a person's life, and in all other cases, when there is no direct or indirect intent, we are talking about causing death by negligence . I propose to proceed from the fact that these two entered the ring clearly not with the intention of intentionally killing each other, so they have no clear intention to take their lives, and most likely they cannot.

", then his act will most likely be qualified under the first part of Article 109 of the Criminal Code - " Causing death by negligence " . Or, in the worst case, if he really "goes too far" and intends to make Conor disabled, then part four of Article 111 may be imputed - " . Just in case, I emphasize that serious harm to health refers (in accordance with the Rules for determining the severity of harm to human health ):

harm dangerous to human life;

loss of vision, speech, hearing or any organ or loss of its functions by an organ;

termination of pregnancy;

mental disorder;

disease with drug addiction or substance abuse;

permanent facial disfigurement;

significant permanent loss of general working capacity by at least one third;

complete loss of professional ability to work;

Answer 2
June, 2021

Injuries and serious injuries in the ring are expected. But death is a completely different matter. Playing sports (Thai boxing) I often went to competitions and was always ready to return with a broken arm, jaw, but alive and with a gold medal.

As described earlier, all martial arts athletes (I don't know about others) really signed an agreement, they say, only we ourselves are responsible for our lives (for those who are under 18, our parents signed). The agreement was printed in black and white: "for injuries of any severity (bruises, fractures, concussions, deaths, including), the organizers are not responsible."

Horror, of course, was catching up with this agreement, but everyone was sure that they would leave as champions.

Once I had a terrible incident: a guy hit a high kick with all his might (from the foot to the head), he fell and lay motionless ... (a common case, I thought: ammonia in the nose, and a sad mine, the hand of which remained down at the end of the fight).

But, alas, no. Neither ammonia nor slaps on the face brought the guy to his senses. As a result, they immediately stabbed him with something, called an urgent medical service and carried him away on a stretcher.

I don’t know his further fate, but I hope everything is fine with him.

So here I am. the organizers did not even budge, and the guy who committed the fatal blow after what happened fought in the final, won and left for his Kazakhstan happy.

PS In general, if you want to kill someone in the ring, kill according to the rules, but with that live. And if you are afraid that they will kill you and think what will happen to your opponent, do not go into the ring, to hell with him. I am sure you will find yourself another hobby, better than "cleaning faces"!

Answer 3
June, 2021

In my opinion, the subjective side will be the determining factor here. Imagine that one of the athletes knew in advance that his opponent had serious problems with some organ and, wanting to kill, struck exactly in the area of ​​this organ. At some point, the enemy falls dead.

In this case, the guilt is in the form of direct intent, i.e. the athlete was willing and aware of the onset of socially dangerous consequences, i.e. of death. In this case, the act will be qualified as murder. If it is possible to prove it at all))

Answer 4
June, 2021

The answer above may be correct, but the main problem is that martial arts competitions always invade personal space and are assessed as a crime.

But in order to avoid trouble, the organizers and fighters at all competitions must draw up an agreement that includes confirmation that "I agree that not my opponent, not the organizers are not responsible for my life and health"

Answer 5
June, 2021

If we consider the theoretical aspect -

An integral element of the corpus delicti is its objective side, that is, its external expression.

For the formation of an "objective side" that qualifies an act as a crime, a number of features are important, among which the "social danger of the act" is mandatory. A sporting event (if everything happens according to the rules) does not fall under this sign, which means it does not entail the formation of corpus delicti.

In short, if an athlete did not violate the sports rules established for his single combat, then he will not be criminally liable for the death of an opponent.

Related question

How from the point of view of science to explain death from hunger?

Read more

Is the phenomenon of self-control (in particular, resistance to instincts) positive from a physiological point of view?

Read more

How does the Goosebump-antistress massager work from a medical point of view?

Read more

Gellert Grindelwald fights Leta Lestrange and the Aurors - 1080p

How are the changes in visual perception (and in particular in color) explained from the point of view of science under LSD?

Read more

Why is the smell of corpse, rot disgusting? Why this sensation from the point of view of evolution?

Read more

What does the stoop of a person say, from the point of view of psychosomatics?

Read more

Have there been deaths in the ring in the entire history of boxing? Was this considered a crime?

Read more

Why does the weekend go by so quickly? And how to prolong them from a psychological point of view?

Read more

Tolkien's Philosophy: Why couldn't Frodo destroy the One Ring?

What happens to a stiff arm from a medical point of view and how to quickly get rid of discomfort?

Read more

What is the difference between a "strong" (stable) nervous system from a "weak" (unstable) nervous system from the point of view of neurology?

Read more

From the point of view of the efforts made, who is it easier to stick a knife into: into a sports body with a pile of muscles, in the middle, or with a fat layer above normal?

Read more

Why does the human male have a decrease in the amount of hair on the whole body, except for the face? (Why does a modern man need a beard, from the point of view of nature?)

Read more

Assuming that thoughts materialize, what interesting opinions are there, why is this happening? From a physical, biological or other point of view.

Read more

15. Crime and the Law

Where did the fashion for a nose ring come from? Why is it so popular now?

Read more

Is death from laughter possible?

Read more

Why do women now love slim and tall, rather than pumped up and strong, but 170cm. How can this be explained, for example, from a biological point of view?)?

Read more

What is the point of going in for sports?

Read more

What is the "death penalty" in football?

Read more

Irwin Weil - Crime and Punishment

Is it true that you can die from squeezing acne on the nasolabial triangle and that is why it is called the "triangle of death"?

Read more

If a boxer from the 1920s and 2000s met in the ring, what would impress or surprise them in a duel between each other?

Read more